All Posts

When families begin supervised visitation, one of the first decisions they may need to make is where visits will take place. Depending on the circumstances of the case, supervised visits may occur in the community, at a designated visitation facility, or at another location agreed upon by the parties. There is no single setting that is right for every family. Understanding the advantages and limitations of facility-based supervised visitation can help parents and professional

Supervised visitation monitors often have a unique view of parent-child interactions. We may spend hours observing visits, exchanges, conversations, activities, and interactions that attorneys, judges, and other professionals never personally see. That can make our observations valuable. It does not, however, make the monitor an expert witness, custody evaluator, therapist, investigator, or decision-maker. Understanding that distinction is important for parents and attorneys

In family law, co-parenting communication platforms are often discussed in terms of accountability, transparency, and documentation. Courts may order them. Attorneys may recommend them, oppose them, or remain neutral regarding their use. Parents may embrace them or resent them. Yet regardless of how they are introduced into a case, communication platforms have become a common feature in many high-conflict family law matters. Most discussions surrounding platforms such as OurF

Objective documentation is a critical component of supervised visitation services. Learn how factual, neutral reporting helps parents, attorneys, and the court make informed decisions.